Prospect of ‘Doklam-type’ pullback in Ladakh makes India wary of pitfalls
With Indian and Chinese troops in Eastern Ladakh facing the prospect of winter in deep sub-zero temperatures, howling winds and low oxygen levels, New Delhi and Beijing are discussing a disengagement plan that might allow soldiers on the 16,000-foot heights around Pangong Tso lake to withdraw to easier locations.
Government sources say Beijing is pressuring New Delhi to accept what would be publicly called a “mutual troop withdrawal”, but would, in fact, require Indian soldiers to withdraw first from their tactically advantageous positions south of Pangong Tso lake. …
Lets stop posting such pics. Also lets stop wasting fuel…we have agreed to what Chinese have to say. I mean who bloody gives a joint statemnt with the invader. They r threatning for war nd we r as usual, shamelessly issuing statemnts
New Delhi alert to US involvement in India-China disputes
https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1205450.shtml
Beijing & Delhi working quietly on unequal “mutual withdrawal” deal from Ladakh heights.
India to withdraw first, but gets to announce PLA withdrawal. Beijing will not contradict.
Echoes Doklam, where India withdrew first, only to find China had cheated
https://twitter.com/ajaishukla/status/1319807000365068289
Prospect of ‘Doklam-type’ pullback in Ladakh makes India wary of pitfalls
With Indian and Chinese troops in Eastern Ladakh facing the prospect of winter in deep sub-zero temperatures, howling winds and low oxygen levels, New Delhi and Beijing are discussing a disengagement plan that might allow soldiers on the 16,000-foot heights around Pangong Tso lake to withdraw to easier locations.
Government sources say Beijing is pressuring New Delhi to accept what would be publicly called a “mutual troop withdrawal”, but would, in fact, require Indian soldiers to withdraw first from their tactically advantageous positions south of Pangong Tso lake. …
https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/prospect-of-doklam-type-pullback-in-ladakh-makes-india-wary-of-pitfalls-120102301718_1.html
India pushes for de-escalation in entire eastern Ladakh in military talks with China
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-pushes-for-de-escalation-in-entire-eastern-ladakh-in-military-talks-with-china/articleshow/78626897.cms
看了看微博上巍岳钦禹说我方说如果印军能退去F2我方能退到F8,以前我们有过类似表态吗?不是F5已经修了一堆设施了?以下是看到的原文
今天在中印边境进行了第七次会谈,跟上次一样,不仅有相关的将军参加,外交官员也参与会谈。综合获知的信息:
我方立场:只谈班公湖,其他地方一律不谈。解放军可以撤到班公湖手指8地区,前提是印度军队必须撤到手指2,中间作为缓冲区。
印方立场:要求对所有冲突地区进行谈判,恢复到四月份的原状。要求解放军全部退出班公湖手指地区,他们认为手指地区没有争议。
我军在中印边境地区盖有大量技术先进的军营,驻军规模不小,新装备也已经到位,足以保证部队过冬。比的就是后勤,看谁撑得住
https://lt.cjdby.net/thread-2656914-1-1.html
这个消息来自印媒。印度Times Now新闻网站10月12日报道称,为了让局势降温,中国做出了不同寻常的建议。中国愿意撤回到班公湖北岸的“8号手指”(Finger 8),但是印度也必须从“4号手指”(Finger 4)撤离,撤回到“2号手指”(Finger 2)和“3号手指”(Finger 3)之间。
报道质疑称,为什么印度要将军队往后撤?首先,印度认为它的领土一直延伸到“8号手指”。第二,在2020年5月之前,当中国的军队在“8号手指”时,印度在该地区的军队没有受到任何限制,那么现在要受到任何限制呢?第三,两国存在巨大的信任赤字。当印度撤回军队时,解放军会停留在“8号手指”吗?这无法保证。
报道称,印度表示,解放军应该回到5月初的地方。他们先行动的,因此也应该先撤回。
Lets stop posting such pics. Also lets stop wasting fuel…we have agreed to what Chinese have to say. I mean who bloody gives a joint statemnt with the invader. They r threatning for war nd we r as usual, shamelessly issuing statemnts
https://twitter.com/Tushapj/status/1308458343329968128
【环球网快讯】当地时间9月15日下午,印度国防部长拉杰纳特·辛格在议会就中印边境问题发表讲话。《印度斯坦时报》称,此次防长讲话具有极其重要的意义。据《印度时报》报道,辛格在讲话中表示,中印双方都认为,维护中印边境地区的和平与安宁,对两国关系的进一步发展至关重要。
报道说,辛格在讲话中批评了“中方打破了之前的协议”,并称印度“做好了准备在列城迎接所有的挑战”。但他也表示,在与中方的会晤中提出需要用和平的方式解决争端。
辛格还表示,截至目前,中印边境问题仍“悬而未决”,中印在边境问题上仍存在分歧。
?rect=0%2C0%2C2000%2C1125&auto=format%2Ccompress&fmt=webp&format=webp&w=700&dpr=1.3
路透社消息说,苏杰生在会谈中向中方表达了印度对中国军队在中印边境实际控制线(LAC)附近集结深感关切。
有印度消息人士援引苏杰生的话说:“中方没有对这一部署提供可靠的解释。”
中国官媒环球时报本周三(9月9日)曾报道中国人民解放军正在将部队、轰炸机、装甲车等装备运往边境地区,并且还在西藏进行了伞兵武装跳伞演习。
印度方面在会谈后没有单独发布声明,印度外交部官员对美联社表示,苏杰生希望确保在所有冲突区域的部队全面撤离,以防止情况恶化,具体的撤离细节将由军事指挥官制定。
2020.09.10
https://twitter.com/FrontalAssault1/status/1304095309019185155